Comparing Direct Real Estate Investment vs. Mortgage Investment Corporations (MICs) and REITs



Real estate has long been a cornerstone of investment portfolios, offering stability, appreciation, and diversification. However, not all real estate investments are created equal. Investors have several ways to gain exposure to the market, including direct property ownership, Mortgage Investment Corporations (MICs), and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Each of these options has unique benefits and drawbacks. 

Direct Real Estate Investment: The Traditional Approach

Direct real estate investment involves purchasing and owning residential, commercial, or industrial property. Many investors are drawn to the tangible nature of owning real estate and the potential for appreciation and rental income. However, it also comes with significant responsibilities and risks to be aware of.

Pros of Direct Real Estate Investment:

  1. Tangible Asset Ownership: When you own real estate, you have a physical asset that can appreciate over time and be rented out for passive income.
  2. Control: Direct ownership allows you to make decisions regarding the property, from maintenance and tenant selection to renovations and when to sell.
  3. Tax Advantages: Investors can benefit from tax deductions on mortgage interest, property taxes, and depreciation.
  4. Potential for High Returns: If the market is favorable, property values can increase significantly over time, resulting in substantial profits upon sale.

Cons of Direct Real Estate Investment:

  1. Illiquidity: Selling real estate can take months or longer, limiting your access to capital.
  2. High Costs: Direct real estate requires a significant initial capital outlay, plus ongoing expenses like property taxes, maintenance, insurance, and possibly property management fees.
  3. Market Risk: Real estate values can fluctuate based on the economy, interest rates, and location-specific factors. A downturn in the market could lead to losses or extended vacancies.
  4. Management Hassles: Direct ownership involves active management, including tenant issues, repairs, and upkeep, which can become time-consuming and frustrating.

Private Mortgage Investing: An Option for Active Investors

Another option for real estate investment is direct private mortgage investing, where investors lend directly to a borrower, often for development purposes. While this approach can offer higher returns, it also carries significant risks.

Pros of Private Mortgage Investing:

  1. Higher Returns: Private mortgage lenders often charge higher interest rates, which can translate into more significant returns for investors.
  2. No Management Fees: Unlike MICs or REITs, private mortgage investing does not typically involve management fees, meaning all returns go directly to the lender.

Cons of Private Mortgage Investing:

  1. Higher Risk: Lending directly to a borrower without the diversification offered by MICs carries a higher risk of default. Investors must thoroughly vet the borrower to mitigate this risk.
  2. Capital Requirement: Private mortgage investing requires more upfront capital, as individual loans are often more significant, and investors may need to fund the entire mortgage themselves.
  3. Illiquidity: Private mortgages are illiquid investments. Once the loan is issued, investors typically cannot access their capital until the mortgage is repaid.

Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): Stock Market-Accessible Real Estate

Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) provide another way to invest in real estate without direct ownership. REITs own and operate income-producing real estate, such as shopping centers, office buildings, and apartments, and distribute profits to shareholders as dividends.

Pros of REITs:

  1. Liquidity: Since most REITs are publicly traded, they offer higher liquidity than other real estate investment methods. Investors can buy and sell shares on stock exchanges.
  2. Income Generation: REITs generate regular dividend income, often based on rental property rental income.
  3. Access to Large-Scale Real Estate: Through REITs, investors can access large commercial properties and diverse real estate sectors, which would be out of reach for most individual investors.

Cons of REITs:

  1. Market Correlation: Publicly traded REITs can be more volatile and sensitive to stock market fluctuations, making them less stable during economic downturns.
  2. Fees: REITs often come with management fees that can reduce overall returns, similar to other publicly traded investment funds.
  3. Limited Control: Investors have no say in the management of the properties or operational decisions.

Mortgage Investment Corporations (MICs): Real Estate Exposure Without Direct Ownership

Mortgage Investment Corporations (MICs) pool investor capital to fund a portfolio of private mortgages, offering investors exposure to the real estate market through the lending side rather than property ownership. MICs are known for providing steady income through mortgage interest payments.

Pros of MICs:

  1. Income Generation: MICs pay dividends from the interest earned on mortgage loans. This provides a reliable income stream, especially appealing for income-focused investors.
  2. Diversification: MICs invest in a pool of mortgages, spreading risk across multiple properties, borrowers, and locations.
  3. Liquidity: MICs tend to offer more liquidity than direct real estate investments, as investors can often redeem shares with a notice period.
  4. Hands-Off Investing: MICs are managed by professionals who handle the complexities of underwriting, managing mortgages, and portfolio administration. Professional and experienced management of the pooled fund helps to reduce the risk and volatility that may be experienced in other real estate investment opportunities.
  5. Further Diversification: Similar to REITs, MICs offer further diversification within a portfolio as they are diversified through various developments and properties rather than invested in a single development, such as private mortgage lending or direct ownership. 

Cons of MICs:

  1. Limited Capital Appreciation: While MICs provide income, they do not offer the same potential for capital appreciation as direct property ownership.
  2. Interest Rate Sensitivity: MICs are affected by interest rate changes, which can impact the returns. Rising rates can increase borrowing costs for mortgage holders but may benefit MICs by offering higher interest returns. This “con” can sometimes be a pro and depends on how the rates fluctuate. 
  3. Potential for Defaults: The underlying risk with MICs lies in the borrowers. If a borrower defaults, it could impact the MIC’s returns, though the portfolio structure usually mitigates this risk.

MICs vs. REITs: What’s the Difference?

While both MICs and REITs provide exposure to real estate, they do so in very different ways. MICs focus on lending to real estate investors and homeowners, generating income from interest payments on the money borrowed for the mortgage. At the same time, REITs own and manage real estate properties, generating income from rental payments and property appreciation.

  • Income vs. Growth: MICs typically provide more stable, predictable income but offer less potential for capital appreciation on the properties themselves over time. REITs, on the other hand, can benefit from property value increases.
  • Liquidity: REITs are generally more liquid than MICs if publicly traded REITs. MICs, while offering some liquidity, may require a notice period for redemption.
  • Volatility: Because REITs are publicly traded, their value can fluctuate with the stock market. MICs, while subject to interest rate changes, are generally less volatile.

Choosing the Right Real Estate Investment

When deciding between direct real estate investment, MICs, REITs, or private mortgage investing, it’s essential to consider your financial goals, risk tolerance, and liquidity needs. Direct ownership offers control and the potential for high returns but comes with significant management responsibilities and risk. REITs provide liquidity and diversification but are tied to stock market fluctuations. MICs offer steady income and a balance of liquidity, making them an attractive option for those seeking exposure to real estate without the hassles of ownership.

If you want to learn more about how Mortgage Investment Corporations can fit into your real estate investment strategy, contact Jordan on our team for personalized insights into mortgage pooled investments.

Our Testimonial
"Cooper Pacific….now there’s a ‘one stop shop’ for many investment needs. I ‘backed up the truck’ and took one of everything…. Corporate account, Personal account, RRSP, TFSA and a RIF. Great customer service and ‘like clockwork’ monthly distributions. I even like the negatives….NO fuss, NO fees, NO sleepless nights…..thanks for a great 10 years….looking forward to the next decade…." Peter B Vancouver, BC

Do you have any questions?

Please enter your email, and we will get back to you right away.

We value your privacy and  will never send irrelevant information